![Circuit coder test 3](https://loka.nahovitsyn.com/244.jpg)
It is extremely unlikely that Greenlanders would agree to any transfer that did not preserve at least the level of autonomy they currently enjoy, even if the United States were to assume responsibility for Denmark's current annual subsidy of $670 million. The Self-Government Act of 2009, recognized by Denmark, asserts Greenland's right to self-determination such that any potential territorial transfer would take place only with the assent of its people. It has since seen numerous further transfers of power from the Danish Crown to its Parliament.
![greenland gaming blogo greenland gaming blogo](https://mir-s3-cdn-cf.behance.net/project_modules/max_1200/867f4942129397.57c1aa719c929.jpg)
Greenland's march toward autonomy began with Home Rule in 1979. While nominally part of the Kingdom of Denmark, Greenland governs its own domestic affairs, including resource development, policing, and the judiciary. However, owning Greenland would not guarantee these benefits. There are several ways the United States can benefit from Greenland's geostrategic advantages without owning it. Taking over responsibility for Greenland's foreign affairs from Denmark would grant veto power to the United States in security matters, enabling the United States to counter the spread of Chinese influence on the island. Control of Greenland could also make sense strategically for the United States in light of Russia's Arctic military buildup and China's recent attempts to purchase a naval base and build airports on the island. It occupies a central location between the North Atlantic and Arctic Oceans, along several shipping routes that are becoming increasingly accessible as sea ice melts, as well as numerous transcontinental flight paths that rely on Greenlandic airspace. Greenland is believed to have the largest deposits of rare earth minerals outside China, many of which are thought to be critical to U.S. The United States did so several times in the 19th century and attempted to purchase Greenland as recently as 1946. Purchasing territory is not a particularly unusual idea in a broad historical context. While Greenland's resource endowment and geographic position would confer economic and strategic value to the United States, its postcolonial history and unique governance regime complicate the prospect of direct ownership.
![greenland gaming blogo greenland gaming blogo](https://i1.wp.com/simonsblogpark.com/onlinegambling/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/greenland_gambling_poker_bingo_lottery_online_gambling_bitcoin_sports_betting_laws_rules_regulation.jpg)
interest in purchasing Greenland have raised new questions in the public discourse about the potential benefits and liabilities of territorial acquisition.
![Circuit coder test 3](https://loka.nahovitsyn.com/244.jpg)